Michael Giltz: DVDs -- How And Why You Should Switch To BluRay

The Huffington Post - 2nd Jan 2009

-1 votes

The Dark Knight: Yep, it's time to make the switch to BluRay. You should buy a BluRay player and/or start buying movies on BluRay instead of regular DVDs wherever it makes sense. If you've got a flat screen TV and a BluRay player, you should also consider replacing some of your favorite movies with BluRay versions. Here's how and why.You own a regular TV -- Buy a BluRay player today and in the future buy only BluRay titles. BluRay players are now very cheap ($200 is common). It seems like an additional expense but every time you buy a regular DVD when a BluRay version is available for a similar price, you're actually wasting money. It's like buying 8 track tapes when you KNOW you're gonna get a CD player eventually. A BluRay player can let you watch all your regular DVDs and any BluRay DVDs you buy. You won't see any difference on a regular TV, but when you eventually upgrade to an LCD or plasma, you'll have a library of titles ready to go.You own a flat screen TV -- Why don't you own a BluRay player? The better brands "upscale" the regular DVDs you already own, making them look better than they are. No, they don't look as good as actual BluRay titles, but it does make a difference. Plus, you should only be buying BluRay titles from now on. The difference is that significant, just like it was when you jumped from VHS to DVD or cassette to compact disc. Replacing the DVDs you already own with BluRay -- Any title you truly love and want to watch over and over again is worth buying on BluRay no matter how much more expensive it is. But in general, I'd say unless a movie is absolutely one of your big favorites, there's no need to replace all your regular DVDs with BluRay. You can watch all those movies and if you have a flat screen TV, the BluRay player will make them look even better than they do. And naturally, comedies and documentaries and TV shows (especially older ones) don't necessarily need the pizazz of BluRay. Of course, if we're talking a sci-fi spectacle like 2001: A Space Odyssey or a landmark film like The Godfather, those are cases where it will be worth your while to upgrade right away. And you can always re-gift your regular DVD copies to someone because they're great movies and a friend will be glad to own them. But for most of your library, I'd wait until the BluRay versions were really cheap (prices better come down at some point) or not bother at all. Your regular DVDs look great. It just doesn't make any sense to keep buying them from now on.Buying new DVDs on BluRay or regular DVD -- In general, I'd just stop buying regular DVDs. Buy a movie you want on BluRay, especially when the price is about the same on BluRay, which is quite common when you're comparing special edition DVDs to BluRay versions of new releases. If the regular DVD version is, say, $20 and the BluRay is $40, just don't buy it. Unless it's some incredibly elaborate special effects extravaganza you're dying to get, there's no reason to shell out significantly more bucks for BluRay. If you really can't bear to wait, maybe it's one of the few movies worth shelling out for. But why not just Netflix it and wait? Dont encourage them to think that BluRay can be an excuse to permanently raise prices on DVDs. But again, don't waste your money on regular DVDs any more. if it's an obscure flick that's never been available on DVD and isn't put out on BluRay, sure, make an exception. Otherwise, hold off. So buy a BluRay player and start building your BluRay library, even if you don't own a flat screen TV. And if you do, the format war is over, so what are you waiting for? Here are some recent BluRay releases and whether they make sense to buy compared to the cost of a regular DVD.The Dark Knight ($35.99 on BluRay versus $34.98 for regular DVD special edition; Warner Bros.) Sure, you can buy a single disc regular DVD edition for $28.98 but I'm going to compare the standard DVDs loaded with extras to the BluRay since if you're enough of a fan to buy the movie, you probably want all the bells and whistles. So in this case, there is only $1 in difference in the cost. And this movie looks stunning on BluRay -- a real demo disc for when your friends come over, whether you're showing off your new TV or your sound system. Finally, when there's no price difference, you'd be foolish to buy a regular DVD. This is exactly why you need to buy a BluRay player now, whatever home entertainment system you have. You can enjoy the movie right away and then be wowed once you upgrade your system. TOMMY BOY ($29.99 on BluRay versus $12.98 for regular DVD; Paramount) -- Okay, an extra 17 dollars is a huge premium, especially when you're talking about a low-budget comedy that won't gain a huge benefit from being seen on BluRay. If you own it already, I don't see the need to upgrade. Naturally, if it's on your all-time favorite list, any movie is worth getting. The Cheetah Girls ONE WORLD ($34.99 versus $29.99 on regular DVD; Disney) -- Okay, the price difference is a minimal $5. On the other hand, there's no need for super great picture or sound on the titles your kids watch, is there? Maybe not, but why buy a regular DVD when BluRay is available and has a few extra bonus features they'll love to check out. When the price is about the same, you should go BluRay, even for kids' stuff.THE MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH ($39.95 versus $39.95 for regular DVD; Criterion) -- Criterion always sets the gold standard for special edition DVDs. Here we have one of their first BluRay releases, only to discover that it costs exactly the same amount as their regular Criterion release. One big difference: the regular Criterion edition came with a copy of the book the movie is baed on. Otherwise the editions are identical and I imagine the extras will be identical when possible as well. Since the movie matters to me more than the extras, I'm especially glad the price is the same. This BluRay also comes in a flimsier cardboard slipcover, which is either another cost-saving measure or an eco-friendly change. But quality control does't get better than Criterion, so it's great news to see them determined to release BluRay titles at the same price point as their regular DVDs.HOT ROD ($29.98 versus $19.98 for regular DVD; Paramount) -- Another low-budget comedy and not a very successful one, despite Andy Samberg's appeal. Is there any reason the BluRay version should cost $10 more? Nope. So wait until the price comes down. But you're itching to own it and wonder whether you should pay $20 for a regular DVD? In general, just go cold turkey. If the price is too high to buy on BluRay, don't buy it at all. That's the only way to let the studios know that you're not willing to pay a premium for the pleasure of buying movies o BluRay. They should see BluRay as a reason to keep you buying titles, not as an excuse to raise prices. Remember, DVDs were better and cheaper than VHS and that market took off. CDs were almost always more expensive than cassettes and for a while it worked but when a cheaper alternative came along (digital tracks) the market collapsed. Lower BluRay prices and be glad people aren't just watching these movies for free online!INTO THE WILD ($29.99 versus $35.98 for the special edition regular DVD; Paramount) -- Here's a terrific surprise. The BluRay edition is $6 LESS than the regular DVD special edition and contains all the same bonus features. It's the same price as the regular single disc DVD. It's an acclaimed film that's beautfully shot and looks great on DVD. Just on principal, we should all buy this title to encourage them into pricing BluRays like this. LOST COMPLETE FOURTH SEASON ($96.99 versus $59.99 for regular DVD; ABC/Disney) -- And here's the exact opposite of Into The Wild, a DVD set that is dramatically more expensive than the regular DVD for absolutely no good reason. (A few modest exclusive extras certainly aren't worth $36.) On top of it, both sets are the same price as previous season sets despite having fewer episodes. Sure, the series looks even more smashing on BluRay than regular DVD -- this is Lost, and not some set-bound sitcom. But this massive price hike is unconscionable. Watch the episodes online and wait for a much lower price point before adding it to your library. Even if the show's a favorite, the gap in prices make this one you should resist. Ray Charles LIVE AT MONTREAUX 1997 ($24.98 versus $14.98 on regular DVD; Eagle Rock) -- Okay, Ray Charles is a giant but this show comes at the tail end of his illustrious career. It's a fine concert, if not a legendary one for such a riveting, iconic figure. Ten dollars more is a big increase for the BluRay version, especially since it's a low-cost price point to begin with. I'm generally avoiding comparing sale prices, but in this case I'd point out that buying it on sale reduces the difference to just over $5. Still, no need to encourage smaller companies to hike their prices just like the big ones. They should provide better value and gain market share on the big boys that way.GHOST ($29.99 versus $12.99 on regular DVD; Paramount) -- Maybe this is your favorite romantic movie and you won't mind ponying up. But again, there's no reason a movie almost 20 years old should cost more than twice as much on BluRay as it does on regular DVD. DEATH RACE ($39.98 versus $29.98 on regular DVD; Universal) -- This is an action flick and so it'll pop on BluRay. And if you're a Jason Statham fan, at least you can tell yourself the extra money is worth the free digital copy the BluRay version offers so you can watch it on your computer or portable device. Still, a 30% increase in price is hard to justify in general.DEATH PROOF and PLANET TERROR ($29.95 each versus $14.95 on regular DVD; Dimension/Genius) -- Two very fun B movies (though I still wish they'd offer the original theatrical version with these movies as shorter double features). And they look and sound great on BluRay. But twice the price? No way, unless female stunt artists are a source of joy for you. OLD SCHOOL ($29.99 versus $14.99 for regular DVD; DreamWorks) -- A very funny comedy that isn't going to really improve dramatically on BluRay. And twice the price keeps this off your list unless Vince Vaughn is unmissable. In that case you probably own it already on regular DVD and there's no need to upgrade.Other recent BluRay releases: The Truman Show ($29.99; Paramount); Event Horizon ($29.99; Paramount); The Women (2008 remake) ($35.99; New Line); Tori Amos Live at Montreaux ($24.98; Eagle Rock); Days Of Thunder ($29.99; Paramount); The Heartbreak Kid ($29.99; DreamWorks); The Strat Pack Live In Concert ($24.98; Eagle Rock); Last Holiday ($29.99; Paramount); and Coach Carter ($29.99; Paramount).So there you see it. On new releases, sometimes you can pay even less for BuRay and often it's within $5. When it's a big spectacle, that makes BluRay well worth it. On reissues of classic movies, the bigger the flick and the more special effects, the more likely it's worth it. And whether it's a comedy, a TV show or a classic western, unless the title is among your absolute favorite, there's no need to shell out 30% or even 100% more just for the pleasure of BluRay. But do buy a player today, slow down or stop your regular DVD purchases, buy new releases when they make financial sense and carefully upgrade your catalog. BluRay is a major leap ahead and you shouldn't spend any more money on regular DVDs if you can help it.

In This Story

The Dark Knight

Vince Vaughn

Jason Statham

Tori Amos

Ray Charles

Andy Samberg

The Cheetah Girls

Related Content

VIDEO STAR AC' 8 : Ray Charles et les Beatles à la Star Ac'... grâce à Michael Gregorio !
Les Beatles ont débarqué rue Charlot ! Vous n'y croyez pas ? Pourtant, c'était...

Album: Bobby 'Blue' Bland, The Best of Bobby 'Blue' Bland (Universal Island)
Any prospective purchasers of James Morrison's album are urged to direct their attentions instead to this splendid compilation of 27 gems from Bobby "Blue" Bland, one of the giants of blues and soul. Instead of sending a boy out to do a man's job, why not get the top man himself? A contemporary of Ray Charles and James Brown, Bland was one of the top blues singers of the Fifties, captured at his best on early-Sixties albums such as Here's the Man! and the mighty Two St

ARETHA FRANKLIN RANKED ‘GREATEST SINGER’
The Queen of Soul has just become the Queen of Rock in a new poll of the rock era’s 100 greatest singers, conducted by Rolling Stone magazine and due on newsstands Friday with four different covers. Aretha Franklin, 66, tops a list that includes Ray Charles at No. 2, Elvis Presley at No. 3, Sam Cooke at No. 4 and John Lennon at No. 5, according to the magazine’s survey of 179 musicians, producers, Rolling Stone editors, and other music-industry insiders.

Louis Armstrong sera interprété par...
Après Ray Charles interprété magnifiquement par Jamie Foxx, c'est Louis Armstrong...

Mr. Belding, saved by karaoke. This is bad, real bad.
Search for Dennis Haskins on YouTube, and you’ll find several videos of the actor singing everything from “Piano Man” to “Mustang Sally.” He sings the latter with Hulkster daughter Brooke Hogan, no less.Haskins loves to sing karaoke, it seems, and on Tuesday, the Chattanooga native will release a CD/DVD combination called “Karaoke With Your Favorite Prinicipal Dennis Haskins, aka Mr. Belding” at FYE Records in Hixson.The idea for the release came up after Haskins noticed the YouTube postings.�

Kanye West shows his pain via song on new CD '808s & Heartbreak'
It's hard to call Kanye West an underdog these days. Though he struggled very early in his career to be taken seriously as a rapper, he's is arguably rap's biggest name now. His first three albums have cemented him as a multiplatinum-selling megastar and multiple Grammy winner. Given his award-show tantrums and altercations with paparazzi, it'd be easier to consider the self-proclaimed "Louis Vuitton Don" just another arrogant celebrity. But his music has always contained enough moral contradiction an

Will white moviegoers go see 'The Secret of Life of Bees'?
My colleague John Horn has a story in Thursday's Calendar section that grapples with the always touchy question--why do white moviegoers shy away from movies with largely African American casts? "Amistad," Steven Spielberg's 1997 slavery epic, was his lowest-grossing movie in 20 years. Even "Ray," Taylor Hackford's Oscar-nominated musical biography of Ray Charles, drew an overwhelmingly black audience. Will the same thing happen to "The Secret Life of Bees," a highbrow litera

Singer Steve Tyrell Performs At Café Carlyle
Grammy Award-winning vocalistSteve Tyrell has signed an exclusive three-year deal to perform during the happening holiday season at the Café Carlyle through 2010. He will perform "This Guy's In Love With You" off of his new album Back To Bacharach and the Christmas classic "Santa Claus Is Coming To Town." A native of Texas, Tyrell has worked with the likes of Rod Stewart, Diana Ross, Ray Charles, LL Cool J and Elton John. You can catch Tyrell at the Café Carlyle this holiday season now through D

Jamie Foxx Covers Men’s Fitness
From playing a professional quarterback in Any Given Sunday to starring as the legendary Ray Charles in Ray,Academy Award-winning actor Jaime Foxx has been willing to do what ever it takes to transform his body to fit his characters. In the December/January issue of Men’s Fitness, Foxx, a former high-school quarterback reveals the secrets and rigors of preparing for some of his most physically challenging roles and why he is willing to make such sacrifices to reach the top of his field. “Awhile

Why Biopics Suck And Are The Worst
Yesterday, in posting the trailer for Gus Van Sant's Milk, I remarked that Harvey Milk's story was one that deserved to be told, and then I took a sideswipe at the Ray Charles biopic, Ray, calling it "bullshit." This led one commenter to complain that this was just more "baseless douchebaggery from Gabe." Sure. Except that my douchebaggery is not baseless. My douchebaggery is very very based. Ray is a shitty movie, and while I'm not going to argue whether or not Ray Charles's story "deserves" to be told, I

Jamie Foxx Covers Men’s Fitness Magazine
Jamie Foxx is looking oh so good on the November 2008 cover of Men’s Fitness Magazine. In this issue Jamie talks about how he gets in shape for different movie roles and why he feels it’s important to look different in every role. Peep out what he had to say about changing his look for his new movie, The Soloist. From playing a professional quarterback in Any Given Sunday to starring as the legendary Ray Charles in Ray,Academy Award-winning actor Jaime Foxx has been willing to do what ever it t

'Valkyrie' Takes An Intriguing Look At Historical Event
Tom Cruise must be the only actor on the planet who can get away with playing any character, at any time, with an American accent. He never really disappears in his roles, not like Daniel Day-Lewis or Jamie Foxx with his portrayal of Ray Charles in "Ray"-no matter what he does, you can't help but looking at the screen and simply thinking to yourself, that's Tom Cruise. If that's the worst thing that can be said about a film, it probably stands a fighting chance. As it turns out, Cruise's refu

Celebrity Birthdays, September 23
Happy Birthday to Cascada singer Natalie Horler (1981), "Son of the Beach" actress Jaime Bergman (1975), WWE star Matt Hardy (1974), prolific folk singer Ani DiFranco (1970), "All of Us" actress LisaRaye (1966), "Transamerica" actress Elizabeth Pena (1959), "Seinfeld" actor Jason Alexander (1959), "The Boss" Bruce Springsteen (1949), actress Mary Kay Place (1947), Spanish crooner Julio Iglesias (1943), blues musician Roy Buchanan (1939; d. 1988), "Green Acres" actor Tom Lester (1938), prolific pianist Ray C

20 Actors and Actresses Who Turned Down Important or Popular Roles
lol 1. Molly Ringwald - Molly Ringwald turned down the role of Vivian in “Pretty Woman” and the role of Molly in “Ghost” among others. She was also offered a part in Scream which she turned down because she was in her late 20’s and didn’t want a teenage role. Also, she was offered Leah Thompson’s role in “Some Kind of Wonderful” which she turned down severing her relationship with John Hughes. Personally, I can’t see her in any of those roles and never felt she was all that great of an

Dave Koz to Perform at ET's Star-Studded Emmy Party
Six-time Grammy nominee Dave Koz will be lending his amazing sounds to the ET Emmy party sponsored by People magazine for the second year in a row. The musician who has played with the likes of U2, Celine Dion and Ray Charles seranades ET's Thea Andrews with songs he will be performing that night -- and tunes that are also on his recently released greatest hits CD. "The songs hold up, the hairstyles don't," he jokes with Thea. This stars invited to this year's party received

Aretha Franklin greatest singer in rock era: poll
She's already the Queen of Soul, but now Aretha Franklin has been named the greatest singer of the rock era in a poll conducted by Rolling Stone magazine. Skip related content Related photos / videos Aretha Franklin accepts the Vanguard Award at the 39th Annual NAACP Image Awards at the …More Enlarge photo Related content Theatre in Weller stage smoke row Body of singer Miriam Makeba in SAfrica Wednesday: official Parky honoured by university role Relat

Picture Perfect Parts: Actors Who Were Made For Their Roles
Some actors were absolutely made to play a certain part. Either their agents are amazing or it was the role they were born to play! Check out some actors who were made for their roles: Jamie Foxx as Ray Charles in Ray In 2004, Jamie Foxx won an Oscar for his role as Ray Charles in Ray. It was obvious when watching the movie he would at least be nominated. Not only did he look exactly like Ray Charles but he sang like him too. Before Ray Jamie was best known for his comedic roles and after Ray, he is s

Who's Got the Best Pipes Ever?
She's already the Queen of Soul, but now Aretha Franklin has been named the greatest singer of the rock era in a poll conducted by Rolling Stone magazine. Franklin, 66, came in ahead of Ray Charles at No. 2, Elvis Presley at No. 3, Sam Cooke at No. 4 and John Lennon at No. 5, according to the magazine's survey of 179 musicians, producers, Rolling Stone editors, and other music-industry insiders. Breaking Down the ListNumber of Women in the Top 20: 2 -- Tina at 17

Aretha Franklin greatest singer in rock era: poll
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - She's already the Queen of Soul, but now Aretha Franklin has been named the greatest singer of the rock era in a poll conducted by Rolling Stone magazine. Franklin, 66, came in ahead of Ray Charles at No. 2, Elvis Presley at No. 3, Sam Cooke at No. 4 and John Lennon at No. 5, according to the magazine's survey of 179 musicians, producers, Rolling Stone editors, and other music-industry insiders. The 100-strong list will be published on Friday, when Rolling Stone hits

Rolling Stone releases list of Top 100 Greatest Singers; Aretha on top
Every once in a while, Rolling Stone remembers that it’s, you know, a music publication and puts out an entertaining, relevant article for people over the age of 12. Their list of “The 100 Greatest Singers of All Time” is one of those articles. Maybe it doesn’t quite pack the clout it once did, back when real musicians graced the cover and not The Jonas Brothers, Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus, but I liked the concept and the way the list was formatted. Each singer on the list gets a

Buzz Bites — 12/9/2008: Amy Winehouse’s Soon-To-Be Ex Wants Cash Or Else He’s Spillin’ The Crack-Laced Beans
+ Amy Winehouse’s soon-to-be ex-husband wants $1.5 million for his troubles, or else he’s threatening to write a tell-all book about their relationship. Um, he can write? Also, wow, didn’t see this coming. But I’d have NEVER GUESSED Britney and Kevin weren’t going to make it either, so I should probably give up my side job as a fortune teller. (AM NY) + Rufus Wainwright compares Amy Winehouse (who’s still in the hospital for a “bad reaction to drugs

Carly Smithson - Carly’s Got a Manager and Madonna Likes Todd’s Tattoos!
Some Carly Smithson news for you peeps who aren’t signed up for her newsletter. The following are some highlights from the newsletter, culled from a chat she did with fans recently: Carly has signed with a manager named Arthur Spivak. He has a lot of experience in the music industry and has worked with Tori Amos, Vanessa Carlton, Collective Soul & Paul Reiser to name a few. Carly has been writing new music and spending time in the studio. Marie is going to film a bit of Carly in the studio and

Tori Amos, 'Precious Things (Live at Montreux)' -- Video Premiere
Filed under: Video, ExclusiveSpinner.com: It's been 15-plus years since the release of Tori Amos' breakthrough solo debut, 'Little Earthquakes,' in 1992. The girl who had teased up her hair, put on some fishnets and grabbed a sword for her first outing, Y Kant Tori Read, had traded all the... Read more

Video: Paul Rudd and Jason Segel in \"I Love You, Man\"
This could work. Paul Rudd and Jason Segel are teaming up for what is likely the very definition of a "bromance" in I Love You, Man. Rudd's playing a guy who realizes he doesn't really have any male friends and finds himself stuck for a best man for his wedding, so he sets out to find a hetero life mate. He eventually does so with Segel. Andy Samberg plays his brother, J.K. Simmons and Jane Curtin are his parents, Rashida Jones is the bride-to-be and we even get some Jaime Pressly and Thomas Lennon ac

Mikkey Halsted - King George (Live) (Video)
Last night, Chicago’s Mikkey Halsted debuted his new track at the African Fest which will be featured on the mythical Green Lantern mixtape, Yes We Can. Featuring Tori Amos on the hook and shots are fired at our nation’s leader. Also, hit the jump for him performing his NO ID produced track, Rebel to America. Shouts to Andrew for footage, he also has another clip so check it out. ~ by Shake on September 2, 2008. Posted in Downloads, Hip Hop Tags: chicago, george bush, king

Michael Giltz: DVDs -- How And Why You Should Switch To BluRay

In This Story

The Celebrifi Network

About Us

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Contact Us

Newsroom